But one is perfect for us or at least me. I know Larry would have accepted more children but he also acknowledges the fact more would have complicated our lives and put a strain on our limited resources.
When Em was younger, she sometimes wished for a sibling but as she has grown older, she sees the disadvantages as well as the advantages of siblings. She knows she is the center of our world, has all of our attention, doesn't have to share our time with anyone. She also realizes she would not have the type of possessions we have been able to afford her if there would have been siblings, or travel the way we have as a family; creating trips around her interests; picking up and taking off on a whim; not having to juggle several schedules in order to do so.
I cannot imagine my life with more then one child. When people would put doubt in my mind and I would start to feel guilty and wonder if I was cheating her of the right to have brothers and sisters, I came back to the conclusion I would actually be cheating her if my attention was divided among many. My love for her is so BIG, yet I cannot imagine having to divide it between several children. That, I feel, would be unfair to her.
Oh, I know parents of multiple children say there is enough love to go around; they love all their children equally but it's not that way for me. I have chosen to give all my love, affection, devotion, attention, time and resources to my one child, the love of my life, the center of my world.
ONE is good! and I would support any couple who feels the pressure of expectations to have several children to go with their own desires and realize a family of three is perfectly complete. Three completes the heart <3>


